Skip to main content

The Book Was Better?

For a book reader when we go see a book to movie adaptation, we always go in with one expectation: the book was better. Sometimes I feel like we go in with this notion that the book is always better. For the longest time, I felt that this was the case. The book was always going to far superior from the film, but is this always the case? 

Ever since I became a massive YA fan when I was about 14, I definitely believed that the book was always going to be better. I would come out of The Hunger Games films complaining that this character was not in a scene and had been cut and that this scene from the book that I loved was not in the script. It would bother me. I would Retweet and Favourite (remember when that was a thing!) things like "I would watch a Harry Potter film that was 19 hours long" and even now I still might but something changed.

I got into films. I mean I know everyone watches films but I was interested in how they are made. Listening to writers, directors, producers. Listening to these made me see the differences in how films and books are made. That films do tend to be 1.5 to 2 hours long and have to convey the same story as a book of 300 to 500 pages or more. Changes have to be made and that's OK.

With films, the book is always there. Regardless of changes that a film makes the book is always going to stay there. Films are just a different type of media. They are designed to make the book into a good enough screenplay so it sells to a wide amount of people as possible. That's what it is, therefore. So this means that changes are made to condense the story and made it fit on a screen.

So I know I still haven't the question so is the book better? I guess the answer is no. Books are a completely different to films and I think that they should be judged on their own. If the film of a book to movie adaptation is bad because it has a weak screenplay and the acting is bad, then it is a bad film, even a book to film adaptation. I know that comparing them to is so easy to say that if they had done something from the book and put in the film then that may have made it better but I don't think this is the case.  

A film could be bad because some of the changes were made from the book but it should still be seen as a different thing. I guess that this whole idea comes from people's opinions because on the flip side a bad book could be seen as a good book to film adaptation. It is ultimately based on people's opinions. Just like this is mine.

I think my take away on the topic is that books and book to film adaptations shouldn't be compared to each other. They are different forms of media and should be treated as standalone things.

This is quite a controversial topic so I would love to hear people's thoughts on this subject in the comments. I don't think that anyone is wrong on the topic and of course everyone's opinions are valid. Let me know what you think!

See you soon, 

Amy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Great Godden by Meg Rossoff

   * I am reviewing this book which I was gifted for free from the publisher in exchange for an honest review. All thoughts are my own. * Title: The Great Godden  Author: Meg Rossoff Publisher: Bloomsbury  Source: NetGalley ( Bookshop UK |  Hive |  Goodreads  |  Storygraph ) Book Summary: Everyone talks about falling in love like it’s the most miraculous, life-changing thing in the world. Something happens, they say, and you know … That’s what happened when I met Kit Godden. I looked into his eyes and I knew. Only everyone else knew too. Everyone else felt exactly the same way. This is the story of one family, one dreamy summer – the summer when everything changes. In a holiday house by the sea, our watchful narrator sees everything, including many things they shouldn’t, as their brother and sisters, parents and older cousins fill hot days with wine and games and planning a wedding. Enter two brothers – irresistible, charming, languidly sexy Kit a...

Popsugar Reading Challenge 2021 Wrap Up

Every year since 2015, I have had the Popsugar Reading Challenge to diversify my reading. Over the course of the last year, I would like to think that I have done this and looking at did a good job considering I have been so busy over the last year. Even though I did actually have a plan of a book to read for almost all of the prompts, I did just wing it for the latter half of the year. This was because I was just reading what I wanted to and because I was not really reading at all.  So let's see what I read this year... A book that’s published in 2021    Book I Want To Read: Gut Feelings by C. G. Moore Book I Actually Read: Gut Feelings by C.G. Moore An Afrofuturist book Book I Want To Read: The City We Became by N. K. Jemisin  Book I Actually Read:  The City We Became by N.K. Jemisin A book that has a heart, diamond, club, or spade on the cover  Book I Want To Read: Heartbreak Boys by Simon James Green Book I Actually Read: Ace of Spades by Faridah À...

Reviewing All Of The Books

Earlier this year, I decided that I would review all of the books that I read. For the most part, I definitely have but over the last couple of months it has definitely gone to the wayside but that is because I have been so busy. I wanted to do it because I annoyed myself that I reviewed books years after I read them and I often couldn't remember the plot. Trust me this is still the case, but I have kind of run out of books that I need to review this year which is weird for me. My backlog is getting lower and as I am not reading as much, I genuinely think I might run out. This has never happened before. This is of course quite nice because I think that it creates feelings that are much better than remembering a book from two years ago. Thinking about it at the moment does definitely make it easier as it goes into my head on a computer screen and less memory space is always a good idea. I also do think that sometimes it does take the fun out of it though but there are a lot of benef...